Argumentation Mining in Scientific Discourse
نویسنده
چکیده
The dominant approach to argumentation mining has been to treat argumentation scheme detection as a machine learning problem based upon superficial text features, and to treat the relationships between arguments as support or attack. However, applications such as accurately representing and summarizing argumentation in scientific research articles require a deeper understanding of the text and a richer model of relationships between arguments. This paper presents a semantic rule-based approach to extracting individual arguments, and demonstrates the need for a richer model of inter-argument relationships in biomedical/biological research articles.
منابع مشابه
Argumentation Mining in Persuasive Essays and Scientific Articles from the Discourse Structure Perspective
In this paper, we analyze and discuss approaches to argumentation mining from the discourse structure perspective. We chose persuasive essays and scientific articles as our example domains. By analyzing several example arguments and providing an overview of previous work on argumentation mining, we derive important tasks that are currently not addressed by existing argumentation mining systems,...
متن کاملOn Recognizing Argumentation Schemes in Formal Text Genres By: Nancy L. Green Green, N. L. On Recognizing Argumentation Schemes in Formal Text
Argumentation mining research should address the challenge of recognition of argumentation schemes in formal text genres such as scientific articles. This paper argues that identification of argumentation schemes differs from identification of other aspects of discourse such as argumentative zones and coherence relations. Argumentation schemes can be defined at a level of abstraction applicable...
متن کاملAutomated argumentation mining to the rescue? Envisioning argumentation and decision-making support for debates in open online collaboration communities
Argumentation mining, a relatively new area of discourse analysis, involves automatically identifying and structuring arguments. Following a basic introduction to argumentation, we describe a new possible domain for argumentation mining: debates in open online collaboration communities. Based on our experience with manual annotation of arguments in debates, we envision argumentation mining as t...
متن کاملArgumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse
The goal of argumentation mining, an evolving research field in computational linguistics, is to design methods capable of analyzing people’s argumentation. In this article, we go beyond the state of the art in several ways. (i) We deal with actual Web data and take up the challenges given by the variety of registers, multiple domains, and unrestricted noisy user-generated Web discourse. (ii) W...
متن کاملA News Editorial Corpus for Mining Argumentation Strategies
Many argumentative texts, and news editorials in particular, follow a specific strategy to persuade their readers of some opinion or attitude. This includes decisions such as when to tell an anecdote or where to support an assumption with statistics, which is reflected by the composition of different types of argumentative discourse units in a text. While several argument mining corpora have re...
متن کامل